Ethics Topics Financial

Topics in Financial Ethics Introduction This work is intended as a reflection and a critical analysis of conscious discernment to find clues about common financial practices in the middle so you can take not only technical decisions “more convenient”, but also at par, ethically correct decisions , even when there are economic interests at stake. To be sure, the first rule of etiquette is critical to be familiar with the phenomenon so we can give an opinion, moreover, engage in full exercise of the will of the opinion that the court of conscience issue. Trouble. To determine whether the relationship between finance and the scope of inherent dignity of the human being should begin by defining terms.First of finance is a specialization that correspond to economic science. The economy is the quintessential treatise of scarcity that is, the needs are many and more and the very limited resources and less and less. The economic problem goes to the center of an eminently human problem, satisfaction of their needs with the proper management of resources. Malthus argued that this relationship was extremely uneven from the generation, as argued: the population grows exponentially and resources at a pace just arithmetic, but what should you do According to his theory at all. Hunger is a kind of natural selection that is responsible for debugging those who deserve to live and who is not.Today we know that it is not, ie there are enough resources for all humans live in dignity, but as detailed in the “essay on poverty, several causes, including insufficient income (measured in money) denies the possibility of living in acceptable conditions for human life, inflicting wounds, in many cases “death to millions of human faces. From this we can discern that there is indeed a close relationship between finance and human dignity, and that is a reality, because it is something established, a deep inequity in the distribution of resources seriously damaging the quality of life of mankind. Current approaches of ethical discernment. The problem of Finance to deny its progenitor: the economy, the danger is an effect that postmodernism generates having punished, in retaliation for the disappointment of modern science do not find the ultimate truth of things (Einstein’s theory of relativity and Heisenberg’s theory of uncertainty) to their ancestors: Western philosophy, and taking away the authority in its ethical dimension. However, there is urgent need for moral discernment elements, otherwise chaos would be responsible for deciding, Malthusian style. In this sense we can say that currently there are three ways to classify the acts in terms of being correct or incorrect: relativism, teleology and deontology. The first one, ie Relativism is the most difficult to define since, as its name implies, the maxim of Protagoras defends: “Man is the measure of all things” but it should make some notes.The first is the danger that takes the contents mixed with postmodern where what matters is “what I feel,” “what I was born” and that would leave most volatile part of the human personality decision making on the other hand, recall that within the current postmodern utilitarianism is the balance that weighs the acts, and that at some point in history it happened to be helpful which makes me happy, and became what he pleases. Moreover thinkers who advocate this style of discerning right from their own abuse fall into trap.

Comments are closed.